Is Long COVID Leading to a Tipping Point in Attitudes Toward Chronic Illness?

A word cloud of long COVID symptoms in the shape of a face mask.

Could long COVID spell the end of medical gaslighting? Let’s hope so.

When Kathy Flaherty, a 53-year-old attorney and nonprofit executive director, got COVID-19 in March 2020, her friends said, “see you in two weeks.”

Two weeks came and went, but she was no better. A former marathon runner, she could only take a walk around her backyard before she was exhausted and had to lie down and rest.

To Flaherty’s surprise and dismay, her doctor suggested that the problem might be psychological rather than physical.

“It was so disempowering and painful,” she said. “She’s known me for decades.”

Now, a year later, Flaherty is doing better, but is still struggling. She’s cut back to half time at work and is getting disability for the other half. She’s also learned she has to say “no” to many things—something that, as a lifetime go-getter, she never did before.

Wilhemina Jenkins, 73, has much the same story. Like many COVID-19 long haulers, she found herself unable to function after the initial symptoms of her virus were resolved.

She tried to make herself do things, only to be back in bed for days afterwards. She was working on a Ph.D. in physics but was unable to complete it because, as she put it, “my ability to think went out the window.”

The difference is that Jenkins, who is African American, got sick in 1983. Back then, the problem was dubbed “chronic fatigue syndrome.” It was mocked by late night hosts and comedians, and called the “yuppie disease” in the mistaken notion that it only affected upper middle class white women. Jenkins struggled to get a diagnosis because as an African American she didn’t fit this stereotype.

It’s now known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). For decades, most doctors treated it as psychiatric. An entire pseudoscience grew up around it, that combined cognitive behavioral therapy with something called “graded exercise therapy.”

In recent years, it’s gotten some respect—though many doctors still believe it’s at least partly psychosomatic. Research into the illness has been thin on the ground.

All that might be about to change.

The symptoms of long COVID and ME/CFS are pretty much identical. They include being exhausted after minor bouts of activity, cognitive problems such as brain fog and memory issues, breathing issues, and neurological symptoms, among others.

With the pandemic sweeping through the population, the number with long COVID has mushroomed. While it’s difficult to pinpoint exactly how many people have it, studies so far suggest it could be anywhere from 10-30% of those infected.

“We saw this coming a mile away,” said Jenkins, who’s been a patient advocate for those with ME/CFS since her official diagnosis in 1988. “We knew this was going to happen because it’s a post-viral deal.”

Many who have long COVID are young and had mild or moderate cases that didn’t require hospitalization. Even children are getting it. With over 30 million cases of COVID-19 in the US alone, that could mean millions of people are struggling to manage their lives.

“I think we’re at a tipping point,” said Jaime Seltzer, Director of Scientific and Medical Outreach at #ME Action, an international advocacy organization. “To say that all of these people are just imagining the exact same symptoms is not working. The psychosomatic approach has reached a crossroads.”

If so, this could represent a sea change in how medicine deals with complex chronic illnesses of all kinds. For decades, the rule of thumb was that if a patient’s symptoms didn’t fit the known boxes, chances were they were creating at least some of them with their minds—in other words, it was psychosomatic.

This wrongheaded view may be kicked to the curb thanks to long COVID. In other words, medical gaslighting could be on its way out—something many chronic illness patients (myself included) think is long overdue.

The nation’s top doctors agree that long COVID is real and needs to be better understood. White House Chief Medical Advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has spoken about it, and there’s a page devoted to it on the CDC website.

Perhaps most significant, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recently announced $1.15 billion in research dollars to be poured into studying long COVID. Because post-viral illnesses all tend to look the same, this research will shed light on others like it, including ME/CFS.

This has Seltzer hopeful. ME/CFS research has never had this kind of cash infusion. More research will provide the kinds of answers that its sufferers have been waiting for decades to get.

The fact is, patients with difficult or complicated conditions deserve better than what we’ve been getting. Too many of us have been subjected to the medical trauma of being told our problem is all in our heads.

Here’s hoping the bright spot in this pandemic is that medicine wakes up to its prejudices and makes lasting changes as a result. It’s high time it did.


Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

As COVID-19 Vaccinations Continue, Disabled People are Once Again at the Back of the Line

Several ampoules with the COVID-19 vaccine.

My husband Leor and I have been in lockdown for a year now. Neither of us can risk getting COVID-19. I’m at high risk for being infected. I also could have serious complications or death from it due to underlying chronic illness.

My health problems include low immunoglobulin M (a condition that makes you more susceptible to illness), an autoimmune disorder, and a neurological issue.

Leor is my sole caregiver. If he gets it and can’t take care of me, I’ll have nowhere to turn.

For a year now, I’ve postponed doctor appointments, haven’t done physical therapy, and have avoided the chiropractor except when I’m in agony. We don’t take outings or have socially distanced get-togethers with friends or family. It’s too dangerous.

Same goes for getting haircuts or trying outdoor dining. We shop online and get our groceries either delivered or through curbside pickup. We can’t even take the chance of taking walks in public parks, because we could end up passing too close to people on paths.

We’re lonely and burnt out. But we can’t get sick, so we soldier on.

When news of the vaccine came out, we had hope that life could get back to something approaching “normal.” Yet disabled people aren’t being considered in this all-important push to get the population vaccinated.

Disabled people have been treated badly throughout the pandemic. States and individual doctors have made judgments about our “quality of life” that put us at the back of the line for treatment. In at least one case, a hospital actually killed a disabled person who had COVID-19. It’s been ugly.

The vaccination process as it now stands doesn’t look much better. So far, decisions about how vaccines will be allocated are in the hands of the states. This leaves us at the mercy of a patchwork of policies, most of which don’t take our needs into account.

Disabled people and their caregivers haven’t been figured into most states’ plans for vaccinations. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), which provides guidance on who should get priority, doesn’t mention disabled people. It suggests vaccinating people with certain medical conditions early. But other than Down Syndrome, disabilities aren’t on the list.

Because I have immunity issues, I was able to squeak into the second phase, 1B. But that turned out to be meaningless. We live in New Jersey, where Governor Phil Murphy decided that this phase will include people 65 and over, along with anyone else over the age of 16 who has an underlying condition…or is a current or former smoker.

By including smokers, he opened up this phase to just about anyone. No one has to prove they ever smoked. And anyhow, how many of us went through a smoking phase in our youth?

Sure enough, after I got a text saying I was eligible for the vaccine, I found that all the sites but one in my county were overrun and no longer taking appointments. The last one is a proposed “super site” that hasn’t been built yet.

I got an appointment there for mid-April, and my husband for late April. That’s a long wait.

I know that by now I shouldn’t be shocked by the ableism of the government and CDC. But I am. There are few provisions for us, little or no awareness of our unique needs, and no recognition of the greater toll that the pandemic is taking on most of us.

For example, like me, many of us need daily help from caregivers. ANCOR, a nonprofit that’s been tracking vaccinations, has found that only 15 states have prioritized caregivers.

My husband qualified only because he’s paid by Medicaid to take care of me and therefore is considered a healthcare worker (which he is). But most caregivers, whether family or professional, are being lumped in with the general population.

Not only is this unfair, but it’s also dangerous for those who depend on professionals. Those who serve multiple clients could be carrying it from home to home. It’s a disaster waiting to happen.

There’s no thinking behind these policies. In Massachusetts, young healthy people who work as researchers or in information technology are ahead of seniors for the vaccine. The state, which has a nexus of healthcare systems in Boston, made the decision to give all employees of these systems priority—even if they have no contact with patients and work from home at a desk job.

This leaves the elderly and, of course, the disabled out in the cold. They’re waiting far longer than is acceptable.

Other states are coming up with self-styled approaches that harm disabled folks. In California, Governor Gavin Newsom announced the state would switch to an age-based approach. This puts disabled people under the age of 65 at the back of the line.

It sounds like it’s more bad news for people with disabilities,” said Andy Imparato of Disability Rights California in an article in the LA Times.

Disabled people in group homes are getting shafted as well. USA Today reports that those who live in them are two to three times more likely to contract or die from Covid-19. Yet, few states have included them in the early push to vaccinate.

According to The Washington Post, Washington, D.C., Maryland, Alabama, and many other states are leaving group home residents out of phase 1A, instead pushing them to later phases. Other states aren’t prioritizing them at all and putting them into the later phase with the general population.

This is just cruel. They’re just as vulnerable as the elderly, yet they’re being passed over.

It’s promising that major media outlets report on the problems we face. But so much more needs to be done. Our lives depend on it.

, ,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

What Do You Do When You Can’t Wear A Mask?

Homemade protective masks in floral patterns and pieces of cloth on a gray background.

The following post is part of our series on perspectives from disabled and chronically ill people regarding COVID-19. This post is not intended as medical advice.


While much of the rest of the world is making its way back outside, nothing has really changed for me. It’s as if it’s still February, when the novel coronavirus first spread itself around the globe. My husband and I are still confined to our apartment.

When we do go out for a walk, we have to be careful to stay off the groomed paths in our apartment complex. The danger is the other walkers out there. I can’t always see them in time. Because of an injury I suffered six years ago I’m unable to turn my head.

So, we walk along the roadway that circumvents the buildings, my husband warning me if other walkers are coming our way so I can stop and avoid breathing in their air. It’s less scenic there, but it’s better than spending all day inside the apartment.

Following my injury, I have suffered from chronic pain in my face, neck and head. If I place anything on my face—no matter how soft—it triggers an attack of chronic regional pain syndrome (CRPS), during which pain spreads across my skin and digs in, becoming intolerable. The pain can persist for hours, days, or weeks. This means I can’t wear a mask. In the age of coronavirus that has become a major problem.

I don’t want to infect anyone else, and I’m also concerned about my own safety. But it’s becoming more difficult, unpleasant, and complicated to get through these days.

All our groceries are either delivered or brought out to the car. We order most other things we need online. We only go to one local park on weekdays when we know it will be empty enough and can steer clear of people.

Like everyone else, I had hoped that my life would return to normal once restrictions were lifted. Of course, I knew that my version of “normal” wouldn’t be the same as it is for most people. But there are many things that made my life enjoyable. Taking a walk along the Delaware River, where geese fly overhead and sailboats make their way downstream. Trips to the farmers market, or the country store that sells bread, flowers and gourmet items. Bringing my wheelchair to the mall to window shop and have tea at Starbucks.

I miss these small pleasures. And now, I wonder when, or if, I’ll ever enjoy them again.

Even worse, I’m no longer getting the care I need. I can’t do physical therapy because the company I used doesn’t offer virtual sessions. I can’t risk seeing the therapist in person three times a week, especially since I can’t wear a mask. I tried other physical therapists, but they require an in-person assessment.

I also need medical interventions to manage my condition. When I recently called to set up the MRI my neurologist had ordered, the technician told me I couldn’t get one without wearing a mask.

When I asked if she was refusing to accommodate me, she said the governor had made it a requirement for every patient, no matter their medical condition. I also tried to set up an appointment with a specialist I need to see. I asked for a telemedicine appointment, but the nurse told me that I had to meet the doctor in person for my first appointment. She said that the requirement I wear a mask came from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and that they were unwilling to make an exception for me, even though I have a well-documented medical condition.

I called my state COVID-19 hotline. The woman I spoke with said that doctors’ offices have the leeway to accommodate people like me. They don’t have to, but they can. So, with conflicting information about where the mask requirement comes from, I can’t figure out how to negotiate my way through this. Meanwhile, my condition is worsening and I’m being deprived of necessary medical care.

The CDC has recommended that everyone wear masks when in the public sphere unless they’re under two years of age, have trouble breathing, or can’t remove one without assistance. I’m not a lawyer, but “recommended” sure doesn’t seem like a legal requirement to me. These recommendations are also too narrow and doesn’t take into account the many disabled people who can’t wear masks for all sorts of reasons.

People with hearing impairments need to be able to hear others and often rely on lip reading. Those who have sensory issues due to autism are also struggling with this requirement. People who have asthma may be unable to get a breath when their nose and mouth are covered. According to Erin Ekins, an autism campaigner, masks can send those with autism into a meltdown, where the body stops functioning properly. And there are plenty of people with facial pain who, like me, can’t tolerate the mask under any circumstances.

An article in the Journal of the American Medical Association advocates a more flexible approach. As the authors point out, there are many reasons a person might not be able to wear a mask, including facial deformities and trauma. “Thus, a delicate balance arises between the public health interest and individual disability modifications,” the authors write.

Many who can’t tolerate masks have been subjected to abuse in person and online. A video of a deafblind woman, Karolina Pakenaite and her sister being harassed on public transportation went viral. “I can no longer stay silent about this as I keep experiencing attacks and hearing similar experiences from others too,” said Pakenaite in a BBC article.

Part of the problem is that masks have become politicized. I’ve read about people faking disabilities so they can go unmasked by downloading phony cards that say they’re exempt. If people are truly doing this, it doesn’t help people like me who have legitimate medical reasons for being unable to wear a mask.

As the pandemic wears on, there needs to be greater clarity and official guidance about what constitutes a legitimate need for an exemption from mask wearing. Much as I don’t want to risk myself or others, I can’t remain in full lockdown mode for what could be years. It’s time for a more nuanced conversation about this issue. Too many disabled people are being left out in the cold.


Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

Listen Up: Chronically Ill People Know What We’re Talking About When it Comes to COVID-19

Blurred photo of medical professionals in protective gear treating a patient.

The following post is part of our series on perspectives from disabled and chronically ill people regarding COVID-19. This post is not intended as medical advice.


It was summer 2014, four months after the accident that left me with chronic illness and pain. I’d lost a third of my body weight. I was so sick and in pain I was unable to eat or drink enough to sustain myself.

With my life in the balance, we went to a prominent San Francisco Bay Area hospital. In the emergency room, a doctor checked me over for about three minutes. She then told me there was nothing they could do for me.

My husband, furious, said, “If she dies, it’s on your head.”

“No it’s not,” she shot back, not missing a beat.

Thanks to help from an influential doctor, another hospital did take me, which saved my life. But in that crisis, I learned something I’d find out again and again over the following years—as a so-called “chronic case,” my life didn’t have the same value as other people’s.

Now that the World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a pandemic, the U.S. is bracing for an onslaught of cases. We don’t know how overwhelmed hospitals will get, but I fear for myself and others with chronic illness and pain.

Many of us are all too used to having to demand, plead, or otherwise bend ourselves into a pretzel to be taken seriously enough to get the care we need. What will happen to us when difficult choices have to be made about who gets what treatments?

The media, far from being on our side, has fanned the flames of prejudice against us. Despite the fact that we’re among the most vulnerable, people with chronic illness are rarely if ever mentioned in the media coverage of COVID-19. And if we are, it’s often in the context of reassuring the public that there’s nothing to worry about as long as you’re young and healthy—unlike those “other” people who have underlying conditions.

The message is clear: our lives are expendable.

As a former journalist, I’m beyond dismayed at how the media is talking about us. It’s a missed opportunity. We’ve been navigating our way through the U.S. healthcare system—many of us for years—and know its strengths and weaknesses. Investigative reporters could and should be talking with hospital savvy patients like ourselves. We could be shining a light on the cracks in the system before it’s too late.

Over the past six years, I’ve seen the U.S. hospital system from the inside out. It isn’t pretty. We’ve learned about triage on TV but in real life, decisions about who gets attention in the ER often comes down to the discretion of doctors, luck, timing, or all of the above. In the crush of a pandemic, I expect these decisions to be even more spur of the moment. I don’t trust that bias against people like me will be swept away. But even if it is, chaos and disorganization could end up harming any number of patients.

After getting through the lottery in the ER and being admitted to the hospital, what I experienced would make your hair stand on end. Rooms weren’t disinfected with the regularity or care you’d expect. Nurses, phlebotomists and assistants were often sloppy about hygiene. In fact, an undercover investigation found that hospital workers were bad about hand washing, with only 30-50% doing so when they should.

You have a 1 in 25 chance of developing a new infection just from staying in the hospital, according to hospital safety monitoring organization Leapfrog. Those odds jump to 1 in 4 for Medicare patients, who are more susceptible due to age or disability—which includes the chronically ill.

Our already precarious situation could become catastrophic when combined with COVID-19, as many of us are immunocompromised. But, really, anyone fighting off this novel virus shouldn’t be exposed to extra pathogens. How safe will the U.S. population be? We don’t know.

The chronically ill could also have problems no one’s talking about. First off, we’re not as easy to quarantine as more typical patients. I couldn’t be moved to a facility such as a quarantine tent or hotel room without my husband or someone else there with me to care for me. As a result, I could die, spread the disease, or both.

The coronavirus itself isn’t the only danger we face. Like so many, I’m dependent on medications in order to manage my condition. Already the FDA has warned of potential disruptions in the pharmaceutical supply chain due to COVID-19. Without needed medications, many of us will need to be hospitalized. Some of us will require intensive care. This would put more pressure on the system.

Finally, there’s the long term. Many people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, for example, started with viruses such as Epstein-Barr and Ross River Virus. There are also post-Ebola syndromes. This means that even after the pandemic passes, we could have a new crisis on our hands. Why aren’t journalists speaking to people who had this happen to learn more about the threat it poses? There’s plenty of discussion on Twitter among those in the chronic illness community about this and many other issues. They’re not hard to find.

The bottom line is that the hospital system in this country is riddled with problems and issues that people like me know all too well. Seen from the inside, it’s a fragile system that will be tested in the coming weeks, months, and even years.

The public needs to learn what we’re up against. Changes must be made before it’s too late. The chronically ill could play an important role in making this happen, for our own sakes and those of millions of others. We need to be part of that conversation, not treated as a side issue to be ignored.

,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.