Healthcare Reform and its Impact on the Disabled Community: Restructuring Medicaid

Image of a paper indicating an explanation of insurance benefits, with a stethoscope and a pen laying on to of the paper.

As cuts to the Affordable Care Act (ACA/Obamacare) and Medicaid loom, the disability community is at risk. The uncertainty around impending changes have many disabled and chronically ill people quite literally in fear for their lives. As a healthcare advocate with multiple disabilities, I have attempted to make sense of upcoming changes by reading proposals from President-elect Donald Trump, Speaker Paul Ryan, Health and Human Services Secretary nominee Rep. Tom Price, and Senate Finance Committee chair Sen. Orrin Hatch. I have also pored over analyses from non-partisan health policy organizations, and there are two changes to Medicaid we are likely to see happen quickly: altering Medicaid funding, and ending the Medicaid expansion.

Creating Block Grants or Per Capita Caps

The majority of Republican ACA replacements propose changing the funding of Medicaid from a match-rate system, where the federal government pays a percentage of all Medicaid costs, to either a block grant system, where the government would allocate a certain amount of annual funding to Medicaid to be spent by the state, or a per-capita cap where the federal government would only pay a “fixed amount per beneficiary” (regardless of actual healthcare costs).

In the simplest terms, restructuring Medicaid into block grants or instituting caps is a way to cut Medicaid funding.

These programs are typically proposed as a way to provide more flexibility to states. However, the proposals for these grants often dramatically slash the budget for Medicaid, and they are unable to keep up with rates of healthcare spending, therefore limiting access to healthcare, and diminishing the quality of services for disabled individuals.

Ending Medicaid Expansion

Another common theme in ACA repeal bills is an end to the Medicaid expansion. This Obamacare staple is a program that has been adopted by 32 states, and allows individuals living in poverty to enroll in Medicaid, regardless of documented disability status. Medicaid expansion has benefited the disabled community because it has mitigated the challenges faced by those who are under-diagnosed, undiagnosed, or otherwise chronically ill and disabled– but not technically “disabled enough” to qualify for benefits under traditional Medicaid.

Estimates show that eliminating the Medicaid expansion would leave more than 10 million of the poorest Americans uninsured and without access to care, leaving an unknown number of people struggling to manage serious illnesses on their own.

The Human Impact

Natasha, a 27-year-old multiply-disabled wheelchair user and Medicaid recipient in New York, is living in fear of this potential new reality. “Losing coverage would mean that I would have no chance of being able to work full time again, and much less part-time… Losing coverage would mean that any adaptive equipment I need would have to be funded through the kindness of others.” Yet, she knows that for others a loss of care could be even more dangerous: “My biggest fear for me personally losing the ACA will mean that I will always be struggling and won’t be able to do something with my life. My biggest fear for others losing the ACA is the possibility of death- a certainty in some cases.”

One patient facing such life-threatening consequences is Melanie, a 37-year-old woman from Illinois. She is on disability Medicaid for a multitude of serious illnesses, and her coverage is already inadequate, leaving her in “meager surroundings because all of [her] money goes to healthcare and medicine.”

As she explained matter-of-factly, any further cuts to her healthcare coverage “would be a death sentence.”   

A 2012 Harvard University study estimated that there were already thousands of avoidable deaths per year in the states refusing to expand Medicaid. Ending the existing expansion and implementing cuts to Medicaid via caps or block grants will only increase the rate of preventable disease, debt, and death.

Athena, a 51-year-old woman with lupus, who is currently insured through Medicaid in New York, knows the stakes all too well. She fears that cuts to the program could mean losing access to care, including lifesaving chemotherapy drugs. She explained her current dilemma, “I can’t afford to be stressed, it makes the pain worse and makes my organs weaker, which means I get more flare ups. But how do you not stress knowing you may lose your healthcare?”

For too many sick and disabled Americans, this is the new reality: changes are coming to healthcare, and we have a lot to lose.

, ,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

Why Healthcare Providers Need to Recognize and Respect Neurodiversity

A white outline of a human brain set against a backdrop of splattered colors in purple, green, orange, yellow, and blue.

Growing up as an undiagnosed autistic girl, I had many “behaviors” that baffled my parents and medical professionals. Seemingly unprovoked meltdowns, ritualistic, repetitive movements, and episodes of compulsive self-injury were explained away as a part of puberty, or diagnosed as a litany of mental illnesses. Throughout the years I received poor treatment from doctors and psychiatrists who ignored physical symptoms in order to focus on mental health issues. It seemed like every physician I encountered was only capable of seeing a superficial version of me – the pre-pubescent “tantrum” thrower, the “dramatic” teenager – and the treatment I received reflected that I wasn’t taken seriously as a patient and a whole person.

As an adult I was diagnosed with autism, and the new label offered an alternate explanation for many of the conflicting psychiatric diagnoses I had been given. The meltdowns and self-injury were symptoms of sensory overload, and the repetitive movements were actually stimming – a perfectly normal form of expression and self-soothing. I discovered the thriving online world of neurodiversity and autistic self-advocacy, and soon realized I was not the only one who had been dismissed and mistreated.

Everywhere I looked, autistics shared anecdotes of abuse and accounts of dehumanization at the hands of medical and psychiatric professionals.

Because of my experiences, when I began the capstone project for my degree in disability justice, I knew I wanted to address healthcare access issues faced by autistic patients. For my research, I recruited fourteen adults professionally or self-diagnosed with autism and asked them to share stories of positive, negative, typical, and ideal healthcare interactions. The interview results were the same across the board: healthcare professionals dismiss autistic patients, which leads to anxiety and a tendency to avoid seeking care, which in turn correlates with dramatic health disparities and premature mortality rates found in the autistic population.

There is limited research on the health and healthcare of autistic adults, but existing studies agree that autistics face higher rates of a variety of diseases, as well as disproportionate rates of mental illness and suicide. Recently, a large study in Sweden uncovered rates of premature mortality 2-10 times higher in autistics compared to the general population, with an average life expectancy 16 years shorter than non-autistics. Even if autistics have a greater genetic predisposition to poor health, the mistreatment carried out by physicians exacerbates this. In fact, the healthcare provided to those with psychological, social, and intellectual disabilities (including autism) is so poor that the World Health Organization declared it a hidden human rights emergency in 2012.

In my discussions with autistic patients, they shared accounts of physicians holding back important information, ignoring obvious symptoms, and minimizing their concerns. When describing their ideal appointment, one individual stated their frustration, saying: “I would not have my symptoms blamed on my neurotype.”

Another person summarized their struggle: “(in an ideal appointment) all of my concerns would be taken seriously. That is literally it. I am so tired of doctors dismissing what I have to say.” It is no wonder the health outcomes of autistic adults lag behind their non-disabled peers when they feel set up for failure before even setting up an appointment.

Above all, my study adds to a growing body of research emphasizing the need for medical professionals to work with autistic self-advocates, treating them as competent and facilitating a patient-centered, neurodiversity-focused approach to care. Yes, there may be unique challenges, and patients may need outside-the-box accommodations, but addressing these concerns should be a part of providing high-quality accessible care. As one research participant explained, “I would like more focus to be put on how I am feeling rather than how I look or how I act, and not be treated like I am ‘difficult’ just because my disability is more complex than having a cold.” Autistics, “difficult” or not, need access to care, and until harmful trends are addressed, health disparities will persist.

, ,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.