Crip Camp Deserves an Oscar Win for Subverting Typical Narratives and Centralizing Disabled People

Half of an illustrated outline of an Oscar award, surrounded by gold stars and purple, pink, and green sparkles.

“I wanted to be part of the world, but I didn’t see anyone like me in it.”

These words, spoken by James LeBrecht indicate the lack of disability representation in media. Countering this lack of representation, LeBrecht set out to tell his story about his time at Camp Jened during the 1970s, described as a “ramshackle camp” once located in the Catskills, New York, wherein disabled teenagers “experienced liberation and full inclusion as human beings.” LeBrecht teamed up with co-director Nicole Newnham, as well as a team bursting with disabled writers and activists, to create Crip Camp: A Disability Revolution. Released at the Sundance Festival, and available to watch on Netflix, Crip Camp tells the interwoven history of the disabled teenagers’ liberation at the camp, and the ways that these newly-emboldened advocates fought for groundbreaking legal changes, such as Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.

With a “100% Fresh” critical score on Rotten Tomatoes, Crip Camp was recently nominated for an Oscar for Best Documentary Feature. While the response to the nomination has been overwhelmingly positive, one critic referred to the film as “Oscar-bait.” These two words have a heavy connotation when it comes to disability representation. An excellent video by Jessica Kellgren-Fozard explains how movies often use disabled characters in a saccharine way, to tug at the heartstrings of nondisabled viewers. Thus, nondisabled people are prioritized over disabled people. Such representation is inauthentic, tokenistic, and exploitative. Even worse, these disabled characters are usually played by nondisabled actors; in fact, half of the Best Actor Oscars have gone nondisabled actors for these portrayals.

With such an established history of negative disability representation winning awards, it raises the question: is Crip Camp Oscar-bait? No.

I genuinely loved this movie and the stories within, many of which parallel my own life. I was born with Spina Bifida and became a wheelchair-user at the age of twelve. For years, the only other disabled children that I knew were the ones who were hidden away in an isolated special education classroom, only emerging when the rest of the school needed to be inspired (sarcasm). This narrative changed when I attended Cradle Beach Camp in Angola, NY. For the first time in my life, I was surrounded by children who looked like me, who moved like me, who lived like me, who conversed with me. Though our conversations weren’t nearly as raunchy as the ones filmed at Camp Jened, they still contained the same levels of heightened awareness of our places in society and our commitment to overcoming, and dismantling, social barriers. Even now, as I work on my Ph.D. at the University of Leeds’ Centre for Disability Studies, I think about my time at Cradle Beach Camp and how it shifted the way that I view the topic of disability. This feat is exactly what Crip Camp accomplishes: it shifts the narrative.

Unlike other Oscar nominated films, Crip Camp isn’t using disabled people in a tokenistic or exploitative way. It does not succumb to inspiration porn, which the late, great, Stella Young discusses in her TED Talk. Rather, it intentionally centralizes the voices and histories of disabled people. It does so in a way that aligns with the popular mantra used by many disabled activists: “Nothing About Us Without Us.” As David Radcliff—Chair of the Disabled Writers Committee at the Writers Guild of America West, and consultant on the film—tweeted: “#CripCamp: A story by us, about us, and for the benefit of everyone.” While it’s true that Crip Camp can, and should, be watched by everyone, what arguably sets this film apart from others is the fact that it has impacted disabled viewers just as much, if not more than, nondisabled viewers.

Kristen Lopez, a writer for IndieWire, firmly believes the film deserves an Oscar. She tweeted: “As a disabled writer who spent a lot of years not seeing themselves, I can’t stress what this movie could mean for a lot of disabled teens growing up right now.” I wholeheartedly agree with their article and tweet; I wish that Crip Camp had existed when I was younger. I wish that I had grown up with this representation.

Crip Camp deserves to win an Oscar not because it inspires nondisabled people, but because it inspires disabled people. For too long, movies have been made through a nondisabled lens, prioritizing their voices over ours. Crip Camp subverts this narrative by centralizing disabled people’s voices. Disabled people are the driving force behind the documentary. Disabled people are the focus. Disabled people are the writers. Disabled people are the stars. Disabled people are gearing up, anticipating Sunday night. To quote Judy Heumann: “Even if we don’t win, we don’t lose.”


Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

Unshoveled College Campuses Leave Disabled Students in the Cold

A large snow drift covering a sidewalk, making it impassable.

Have you ever wondered why the song is titled “Walking in a Winter Wonderland”? The answer is quite simple: the Winter Wonderland is completely inaccessible, leaving thousands of people with physical disabilities and mobility impairments unable to traverse through the snow-covered sidewalks.

Nowhere is this more problematic than on college campuses.

While I’m fortunate enough to attend a college where there are snow plows to battle the relentless storms, many students aren’t as fortunate. When colleges allocate funding for sports, athletes, sports-related public speakers, sports-related murals showing the athletes so that the sports-related public speakers can have a backdrop when they speak about sports, and the occasional investment in academics, there’s little to no funding set aside for snow removal.

This might not seem like an issue to the average abled person but consider this:

  • Many colleges have campuses that stretch on for miles.
  • Many students experience the packed schedule wherein they have to get from one side of the campus to the other in ten minutes lest they be late.
  • Many students face grading and/or disciplinary consequences if they are late multiple times.
  • And even if you omit the above consequences, students who are late will still miss out on vital information.

In addition to these problems, unshoveled sidewalks can cause major safety concerns for both disabled and able-bodied students. Not only do students have to worry about tripping or falling, but they also have to worry about prolonged exposure to the cold temperatures and precipitation. And of course, we also have to take into account the fear that comes with being a disabled person trapped in the snow with no way to move and nobody around. The thought of this happening is terrifying to me and I know I’m not the only disabled person who worries about it.

On the bright side, college campuses are usually packed with students who are always willing to lend a hand. Yet colleges should not have to depend on their students to keep each other safe; it should be the responsibility of the staff. Having clear and safe pathways across a college campus shouldn’t be a luxury or an afterthought; it should be a given.

Normally I’m very passive when it comes to advocating but this particular topic has made me saltier than the sidewalks. Then again, if the sidewalks were salty, I wouldn’t be writing this article. So, this is a call-to-action for any and all staff members at college campuses across the nation: please do everything within your power to ensure that your campuses are as accessible as possible in the winter. Everyone, including disabled students, has the right to be able to freely and safely get around.

And since we have places to go, clear the snow, clear the snow, clear the snow!

, ,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.

Disability and Tokenism: Why No One Can Speak On Behalf of Everyone

People standing to form the shape of a megaphone.

Why is it that so many people look at a single person from a minority group and automatically assume that they represent the group as a whole? Nowhere does this issue, known as tokenism, seem more prevalent than in higher education. In my experience, it’s been a huge problem.

As an Early Childhood Education Major, I often study the different ways to incorporate inclusivity in our classrooms. Each semester, I have to try not to flinch as my classmates get whiplash from how fast they turn to look at me when the word “disability” is mentioned.

Keep in mind, I have spent years working with students with disabilities, reading dozens upon dozens of scholarly articles on different teaching methods and approaches, and joining advocacy efforts of multiple organizations. But in the eyes of my classmates, these credentials aren’t what qualify me to speak on behalf of students with disabilities. No – my wheelchair is what qualifies me.

Apparently, having a disability means I have the authority to answer every single question that has to do with disabilities. In addition to assumptions made by my classmates, I have faced an endless line of professors calling on me time and time again when it comes to the topic of disabilities. Make no mistake – I am happy to share my opinions, including those based on the research and professional knowledge that I have gathered. However, it is unfair for professors, faculty, and administration to assume that my disability means I’m able to speak on behalf of every single person who has a disability.

Each person with a disability has different needs, different opinions, different personalities. Each student with a disability requires different accommodations based on their individual strengths and weaknesses. So, I cannot tell you what a blind student needs to succeed any more than they can tell you what I, a wheelchair user, needs to succeed. Nor can I tell you what another student in a wheelchair needs to succeed anymore than they can tell you what I need.

I think I speak on behalf of everyone when I say that it is impossible to speak on behalf of everyone.

We all want to feel like we have the power to be a voice for others. But the truth is that we all only have one voice. It is not fair for nondisabled students and college professors to look onto a disabled student with the expectation that they can be the token voice for an entire community, and it is not fair for a disabled student to speak for everyone. Even if they are called upon to do so, it is important to remember that differing views must be brought to the table if a classroom is to ever truly be inclusive. For inclusivity does not mean simply listening to one voice. Inclusivity is about hearing as many voices as possible, exposing yourself to as many opinions as possible, and seeing the reasoning behind each and every stance surrounding an issue.

,

Rooted in Rights exists to amplify the perspectives of the disability community. Blog posts and storyteller videos that we publish and content we re-share on social media do not necessarily reflect the opinions or values of Rooted in Rights nor indicate an endorsement of a program or service by Rooted in Rights. We respect and aim to reflect the diversity of opinions and experiences of the disability community. Rooted in Rights seeks to highlight discussions, not direct them. Learn more about Rooted In Rights

Click here to pitch a blog post to Rooted in Rights.